Asana Vs. Zoho for Free, Basic Task & Project Management

One of the increasingly important challenges we all face these days is sifting through all the myriad of technological distractions in our daily lives in order to help us focus only on that which truly matters.

For those of us less naturally gifted at prioritizing, having good tools can be essential. For this reason, we’re working on a series of posts to help people sort through the overwhelming options out there.

Below is a very specific comparison from a few years back we wanted to share again for anyone looking for this very niche topic (if not, feel free to skip this one, as we’ll be releasing more generalized info soon). Cheers!

(Estimated 4 minute read)

Previously, we had written a brief article on how I use Asana to combat distraction. Asana is a newer tool than Zoho that has been undergoing fairly rapid development, but I’d like to briefly touch on some of what it gets right and wrong vs. Zoho.

Assigning multiple people to a task:

I get that Asana deliberately limits this functionality, and has recently made it possible to duplicate your task to emulate this feature, but this can quickly get really messy and create more confusion! Zoho hasn’t over-thought this and makes it easy to tag exactly who you need on a given task.

The ability to see multiple task lists at a glance:

Even if you’re using a task manager purely for personal use, who among us these days is not juggling several separate projects, each with its own prioritized tasks at once? Asana finally added a way to easily see and manage these separate lists at a glance, making it much easier to get an overview of all that’s on your plate on a given day. This can now be done by setting up a new project board, rather than a traditional list.

While it may not be immediately obvious how to do this in Zoho, there is a great feature for this, the Kanban View, which allows you to easily drag to reorder and move tasks from one project to another.

A nice premium account feature Zoho has, which Asana still lacks: Dependencies, milestones & timelines!

Asana seems to feel that a simple calendar view is sufficient for gauging a project’s full timetable, and that hard-to-find and navigate sub-tasks are somehow sufficient tools for dealing with longer-term projects with milestone/deadlines. For me, it is not, and I require a way of getting an overview glance of this. Zoho seems to be one of the only collaborative tools out there that supports Gantt-style charts, and does it well. To me, this is an essential feature that Asana needs to adopt ASAP.

User Interface Comparisons

Yes, I know this screen capture is now outdated, but the basic UI hasn’t really changed much.

One of the things that initially appealed to me about Asana was its simple, modern UI. While I generally don’t mind Asana’s interface, most of the people on my team do. They find it very cluttered and overwhelming, and I can certainly see their point. A single, endless task list at a time can really feel claustrophobic and daunting.

While Zoho is far from perfect in this regard, its host of various layouts means that you will probably find a view that works for you, and if the people I work with are any indication, your collaborators may likely find it cleaner and easier than Asana.

For all of Asana’s modern back-end, it still takes longer than I would like to fire up and can be sluggish and unresponsive at times, requiring unnecessary full app refreshes. Zoho seems more old-school, but frankly just performs well with very little latency.

At the end of the day, only you can choose which solution is better for you, but if Asana is simply not meeting your project management needs, you might suggest giving Zoho a try.

Full disclosure: We have absolutely no affiliation with either Asana or Zoho and would like to see both products continue to improve and look forward to continuing to evaluate both as they evolve!

Did we overlook something? Disagree with us? Drop us a line and let us know. Thanks!

Why Voting With Your Feet—And Your Wallet—Is So Important

“We put so much emphasis on Election Day, but the vital acts of voting we commit every day are never discussed. You vote when you shop at the grocery store, pump gas at the gas station, pay your rent, purchase a new washing machine, or buy a latte. You are voting with your feet (and your wallet) and sending important messages about your preferences to the people trying to give you what you want.”

Full article: https://tifwe.org/the-vital-acts-of-voting/

3 Tips on Using Asana to Manage Your Tasks to Combat Distraction

Unless you perhaps register somewhere on the autism spectrum and/or every moment of your life is being painstakingly managed for you, you are probably struggling more than ever to juggle a seemingly endless barrage of things you want and need to do on any given day. And multiply that by at least a few times if you happen to fall anywhere on the ADhD continuum!

While no tool can offer a perfect solution for keeping organized, I have tried quite a few over the years and the best I’ve found for me to-date is Asana — which is 100% free, if you happen to be working alone or in a fairly small team!

Despite having been recently designed, though, navigating Asana can still be a bit unintuitive for the unfamiliar, so I decided to share a few techniques I use, in hopes that you’ll find some utility in them!

Only assign high-priority tasks to individuals, assign everything else by Project
I highly recommend assigning everything that’s not an immediately pressing task by Project and tags, and not assigning a task to a person (including yourself), unless it’s something that needs to be acted on within the next few days. Otherwise, you’ll end up with an endless, overwhelming list of to-dos that will sabotage that crucial sense of progress, accomplishment and clarity that is so essential to the process of organizing and getting things done. This allows you keep your project management separate from your task management, going back & forth between the Project and Team Member views.

Only use ‘Headings’ for milestone-markers, within Projects, not as task-containers!
As you may know, ending the name of a given task with a colon turns it into a ‘heading’, but when you drag to reorder these, they move independently of any tasks that fall under these ‘headings’, which brings me to my last tip:

Keep every complex task organized with its own sub-tasks, but only go one level deep
If you weren’t aware, you can (and should!) ‘nest’ tasks within other tasks in Asana to group smaller tasks within overarching objectives. I recommend doing it this way because, unlike Headings (see above), it is easy to grab and rearrange them by their ‘parent’ task in any task list. The reason I suggest only ‘nesting’ them only one level deep is because navigating any deeper than one level through Asana can be a bit of a nightmare, and it’s almost impossible not to lose sub-tasks if they are nested any more than one-level in!
NOTE: In order to effectively use this method, it is also essential to keep the task description empty for any ‘parent’ tasks (objectives), because Asana lists sub-tasks below this, and adding descriptions more than a line or two long will push the sub-tasks down out of view!

I hope you found these techniques to be beneficial — Please drop me a message and/or leave a comment either way! Cheers.

Reality Check: Did Australia And Great Britain See Lower Gun Violence After Mass Confiscation?

Reality Check: Did Australia And Great Britain See Lower Gun Violence After Mass Confiscation?

Only days after mass shooting at the community college in Oregon, President Obama said that the United States needs to follow the lead of Great Britain and Australia—nations that instituted large scale gun bans and confiscation after mass shootings on their soil.

So would it work here?

Maybe the more important question is: did it work there?

https://youtu.be/jtzbwrJtXzg

“We know that other countries in response to one mass shooting have been able to craft laws that almost eliminate mass shootings,” Obama said. “Friends of ours, allies of ours, Great Britain and Australia, countries like ours.”

That was Obama speaking shortly after the community college shooting in Oregon.

The president says that Great Britain and Australia are great examples of nations that have taken control of gun violence. But are they?

It made us think—what is the real story behind those countries?

Let’s start with Great Britain.

On August 19, 1987, Michael Ryan killed 15 people and wounded 15 others in a series of random shootings around Hungerford, Berkshire. He also killed his mother before taking his own life. The pistol and two semi-automatic rifles he used in the massacre were all owned legally.

As a result, Great Britain enacted some of the world’s strictest gun-control measures in the late ’80s and ’90s. In Britain, a nation of 63 million people, more than 200,000 guns and 700 tons of ammunition have been taken off the streets during the past 15 years.

So what has the result been?

Early on, the ban appeared to have little impact, as the number of crimes involving guns in England and Wales rose heavily during the late 1990s to peak at 24,094 in 2003/2004.

Since 2004 though, the number of crimes involving guns has fallen each year. In 2010/11 there were 11,227 offenses, 53 percent below the peak number.

But that is not to say that this ban ended mass shootings in Great Britain, because it did not.

In 2010 a lone gunman killed 12 people in a four-hour shooting spree in northern England.

So what about Australia?

This is a more dramatic example.

In 1996, a 28-year-old man killed 35 people with a semi-automatic rifle in the Tasmanian city of Port Arthur. Twelve days later, a gun-confiscation program was rushed through the Australian parliament.

The National Agreement on Firearms all but prohibited automatic and semiautomatic assault rifles, stiffened licensing and ownership rules, and instituted a temporary gun buyback program that took some 650,000 so called assault weapons (about one-sixth of the national stock) out of public circulation.

The images are pretty incredible from that time. This agreement was called a gun buyback, but it really wasn’t. It was mandatory.

So what were the effects of this program?

Interestingly, there have been at least two major studies done on the program and gun homicides. University of Melbourne researchers Wang-Sheng Lee and Sandy Suardi did the first, and in 2008 they completed a report on the matter saying:

“In this paper, we re-analyze the same data on firearm deaths used in previous research, using tests for unknown structural breaks as a means to identifying impacts of the National Firearms Agreement. The results of these tests suggest that the NFA did not have any large effects on reducing firearm homicide or suicide rates.”

“In this paper, we re-analyze the same data on firearm deaths used in previous research, using tests for unknown structural breaks as a means to identifying impacts of the National Firearms Agreement. The results of these tests suggest that the NFA did not have any large effects on reducing firearm homicide or suicide rates.”

And a second report concluded that while the mandatory program did reduce the rate of “accidental” firearm deaths, it had no influence on firearm homicide in Australia and it also did not end mass shootings.

In 2002 two people were killed and five were injured in a shooting at Melbourne’s Monash University. In 2011 three people were killed and three were wounded in the Hectorville siege. In 2014, three people (including the gunman) were killed and four were injured in a Sydney hostage crisis.

What you need to know is that even with mass confiscation of weapons, Australia could not end all mass shootings and the rate of gun homicides wasn’t actually affected.

But here is something else worth mentioning: the 650,000 guns confiscated in Australia were between one-fifth and one-third of all guns in the country.

Compare that to the United States and that would require confiscation of around 105 million firearms—something that would not only be unconstitutional but would likely become incredibly violent.

In other words, mass confiscation in the United States, simply cannot happen. Not right now—possibly not ever.

That’s Reality Check. Let’s talk about that on Twitter @BenSwann_

https://www.facebook.com/CBS46/videos/10153720993101252/

The Most Violent Era In America Was Before Europeans Arrived

“There’s a mythology about the Native Americans, that they were all peaceful and in harmony with nature—it’s easy to create narratives when there is no written record.”

“Writing in the journal American Antiquity, Washington State University archaeologist Tim Kohler and colleagues document how nearly 90 percent of human remains from that period had trauma from blows to either their heads or parts of their arms.”

Continue reading: The Most Violent Era In America Was Before Europeans Arrived

Understanding Inflation: Changes in Purchasing Power

Purchasing Power of the Consumer Dollar 1913-2017

“Inflation is taxation without legislation.” – Milton Friedman

Why does your monthly rent today cost just as much as the down payment your grandparent’s put on their home 70 years ago? The answer is inflation. Economics Professor Robert Lawson explains how inflation is essentially the change in the purchasing power of your money (i.e. how many tacos can you buy with, say, $20 today as compared to a decade ago).

When inflation occurs, you’re able to buy fewer goods and services with the same amount of money. And when inflation really picks up, it can have catastrophic economic consequences.

Watch Professor Lawson below to learn more:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VxcEncR5fQ

Lobbyists: Obama White House Hides Meetings Off-Site

“Caught between their boss’ anti-lobbyist rhetoric and the reality of governing, President Barack Obama’s aides often steer meetings with lobbyists to a complex just off the White House grounds – and several of the lobbyists involved say they believe the choice of venue is no accident. It allows the Obama administration to keep these lobbyist meetings shielded from public view — and out of Secret Service logs collected on visitors to the White House and later released to the public.”

Source: Lobbyists: Obama White House Hides Meetings Off-Site

“I no longer hope for audacity”: Matt Damon turns against Obama as President loses his celebrity friends

“Actor Matt Damon — who was one of the President’s earliest and best-known celebrity supporters during his 2008 campaign—said point blank that he was unhappy with the way the country is being run in an interview with Piers Morgan last night. He also slammed the President for failing to follow through on many of his campaign promises, particularly on education…”

Story: “I no longer hope for audacity”: Matt Damon turns against Obama as President loses his celebrity friends